Driving travel and carrier industry figures have asked the executive to supplant cover isolate measures with territorial travel halls.
In a letter to Boris Johnson, they said the 14-day isolate for individuals originating from Spain had caused interruption.
It was “the most recent noteworthy hit to a part which currently chances being for all time scarred”, they included.
They called for isolate free travel to regions unaffected by any spike in coronavirus cases.
This would incorporate Spain, however other key markets for exchange and the travel industry, for example, the US and Canada.
“We are in a circumstance where the legislature is educating against movement to regions with respect to Spain that have lower paces of Covid than the UK,” the letter said.
“We direly demand a gathering with you to examine the test confronting our part and our proposed ways forward,” the letter closed.
Among the almost 50 signatories of the letter were British Airways CEO Alex Cruz, Heathrow CEO John Holland-Kaye and Airlines UK CEO Tim Alderslade.
Travel industry boss are looking for approaches to safeguard the Christmas season.
Their intercession came after Culture Secretary Oliver Dowden told the BBC that coronavirus testing at air terminals was not a “silver projectile” to stop the requirement for isolate, on the grounds that the infection could create over the long haul.
The administration’s abrupt change to travel guidance for Spain at the end of the week provoked a new rush of disarray and vulnerability to individuals’ vacation plans.
Transport Secretary Grant Shapps got back ahead of schedule from his own Spanish occasion on Wednesday and will presently start fourteen days’ isolate, yet he guarded the administration’s choice .
“We needed to act when we did. The figures since have indicated why that was required. I’m urgently tragic and sorry for individuals who have lost their days off,” he said.
Travel firm Tui said on Wednesday it had dropped occasions to the Balearics and Canary Islands until 4 August after the UK broadened its recommendation against superfluous travel to Spain to incorporate its islands.
Mr Holland-Kaye told the BBC’s Today program the turmoil brought about by the progressions to direction over Spain indicated the requirement for another option.
He said air terminals ought to be permitted to test for coronavirus to maintain a strategic distance from the “precipice edge” of isolate.
Heathrow’s budgetary outcomes, out on Wednesday, indicated travelers everything except halted travel in the three months to June, falling by 96% on a year back as worldwide flight arrived at a virtual stop. Income was 85% lower than a year ago at £119m.
Mr Holland-Kaye stated: “The present outcomes should fill in as a clarion require the legislature – the UK needs a traveler testing system and quick. Without it, Britain is simply playing a round of isolate roulette.”
He said he needed the administration to work with the organization on the arrangement and he could have testing destinations set and prepared “inside weeks”.
Be that as it may, Mr Dowden suppressed the thought, saying: “We are not at where there is a reasonable option in contrast to the 14-day isolate.”
In any case, he included that all alternatives were under audit.
Different nations are working air terminal testing. It is deliberate – and free – at some German air terminals now in spite of the fact that it might get compulsory, all things considered in France for appearances from high-hazard nations, for example, the US and Brazil.
The Netherlands approach is to single out individuals originating from explicit regions with elevated levels of diseases -, for example, a couple named locales in Spain and the UK city of Leicester and urge them to self-detach.
Dr Hans Kluge, Europe local chief for the World Health Organization, supported testing at air terminals as a component of general endeavors to follow the development of coronavirus.
He told the Today program: “Testing is rarely off-base – regardless of whether at air terminals, network or drive-in focuses – what’s the distinction between everyday life and voyaging?”
Mr Holland-Kaye said a UK air terminal test would cost about £150 each, and travelers would be relied upon to pay.
He recognized that was “not modest”, however that the test would descend after some time as more individuals took it.
Introducing testing at air terminals is an alluring thought. The hypothesis being individuals could travel where they like and simply get tried as they show up back in the nation, discrediting the need to self-segregate.
In any case, the administration isn’t persuaded.
Why? Strategically testing all the explorers who show up each week will be troublesome.
Testing limit has expanded yet this would extend the framework. Also the down to earth troubles of setting up testing offices in occupied air terminals.
Be that as it may, the other factor, which is maybe increasingly pivotal, is that in the beginning phases of disease the test may not get it.
Rather, authorities are substantially more convinced by a progressively insightful, directed way to deal with self-disengagement.
That would include asking just those originating from specific areas in a nation where the disease rates are most elevated to self-disconnect.
That could then be supplemented by then requesting that they get tried following seven days, which means on the off chance that they test negative, there would be no requirement for the full 14-day self-separation.
This and more is being talked about in the background.
Mr Holland-Kaye stated: “The point is have a test on appearance. We could have it ready for action in the following fourteen days.”
He said the arrangement would be for travelers to go into isolate and have another test following eight days: “On the off chance that they were contaminated we would be sure that it had shown itself. On the off chance that it was clear, they would be permitted to leave isolate sooner than had been the situation. It’s deductively based.”